‘No consensus’ in intelligence neighborhood over Russia bounty on U.S. troops document, White House says

‘No consensus’ in intelligence neighborhood over Russia bounty on U.S. troops document, White House says
Spread the love
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  


Courtney Subramanian and Michael Collins
USA TODAY
Printed 10:06 PM EDT Jun 29, 2020

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump had no longer been briefed on experiences that Russia became once in the lend a hand of bounty funds to Taliban-linked militants over winning assaults on coalition troops because there were “dissenting opinions” within the U.S. intelligence neighborhood over the veracity of the experiences, a White House spokeswoman talked about Monday. 
“There could be not this form of thing as a consensus within the intelligence neighborhood on these allegations and in form there are dissenting opinions from some in the intelligence neighborhood when it comes to the veracity of what is being reported,” White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany talked about at a briefing with reporters. “The veracity of the underlying allegations proceed to be evaluated.”
The White House briefed contributors of Congress over the intelligence experiences Monday, McEnany told reporters. 
Lawmakers had pressed the administration for extra particulars after the New York Times reported Friday that Trump became once informed months prior to now that a Russian intelligence unit offered secret money funds to Taliban-linked militants to abolish coalition troops, at the side of American citizens. 
McEnany declined to drawl who attended the administration’s briefing however told reporters White House chief of workers Tag Meadows called Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Democratic House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer on Sunday night to lengthen a bipartisan invitation to eight contributors of relevant committees. 
Trump has insisted he did no longer discover out about the reported bounty and Russia and the Taliban have denied the existence of this form of funds. 
Though lawmakers were receiving a briefing over the bounty allegations on Monday afternoon, McEnany talked about the president mute hadn’t been briefed on the difficulty because he’s most attention-grabbing “briefed on verified intelligence.” She additionally declined to drawl whether or no longer the intelligence became once incorporated in the president’s written day-to-day briefings. 
Trump tweeted Sunday night that intelligence officials had “correct” informed him they did not mediate the document credible and resulting from this truth did no longer quick him or Vice President Mike Pence on the initial intelligence. 
Director of Nationwide Intelligence John Ratcliffe talked about in an announcement Saturday that he had “confirmed that neither the President nor the Vice President were ever briefed on any intelligence alleged by the New York Times in its reporting.” 
The document, later confirmed by multiple news agencies, alleged that a unit of Russia’s defense pressure intelligence agency – the G.R.U. known for orchestrating assassinations and destabilization efforts in opposition to western democracies – became once in the lend a hand of the bounties on U.S. troops. 
The intelligence became once in accordance to interrogations of militants in Afghanistan that discovered Russia offered funding for winning assaults on coalition troops final 365 days, per the Times document. 
McEnany slammed the New York Times for its “irresponsible” decision to put up a document that the president had been briefed, however the paper has stood by its reporting. 
“We stand by our memoir, the particulars of which have no longer been denied by the President’s comprise Nationwide Security agencies,” talked about Times spokeswoman Eileen Murphy. 
Late Monday, Ratcliffe and CIA Director Gina Haspel issued separate statements denouncing intelligence leaks to the clicking.
“The selective leaking of any classified data disrupts the well-known interagency work to earn, assess, and mitigate threats and areas our forces in bother,” Ratcliffe talked about. “It is additionally, simply set up, a crime.”
Ratcliffe talked about officials “are mute investigating the alleged intelligence referenced in fresh media reporting, and we can quick the president and congressional leaders on the marvelous time. That is the analytic process working the contrivance it will mute. Unfortunately, unauthorized disclosures now jeopardize our ability to ever gather out the paunchy memoir with appreciate to those allegations.”
Haspel stressed that after developing intelligence assessments, initial experiences generally require “further assortment and validation.”
In fashioned, she talked about, preliminary intelligence data “is shared at some level of the nationwide security neighborhood – and with U.S. allies – as allotment of our ongoing efforts to guarantee the safety of coalition forces in a foreign country.  Leaks compromise and disrupt the excessive interagency work to earn, assess, and ascribe culpability.”
Get. Jim Banks, R-Ind., who talked about he became once amongst the Republicans who attended the White House briefing, accused the Times of the expend of “unconfirmed intel in an ONGOING investigation into targeted killing of American troopers in repeat to smear the President.”
The Connected Press reported suspicions were raised after contributors of the elite Naval Special Battle Pattern Community, generally generally called the SEAL Crew Six, discovered $500,000 whereas raiding a Taliban outpost earlier this 365 days. 
Unnamed intelligence officials told the AP they’re investigating assaults on U.S. troops in Afghanistan in 2019 to gather if there became once any evidence connecting them to the Russian bounties. 
What we know: Experiences whine Russia offered bounty on US troops in Afghanistan
The White House came stressed after a chorus of lawmakers – each and every Republican and Democratic – wondered whether or no longer the president became once kept in the darkish or if he declined to behave after he became once briefed on the intelligence.
Quite loads of lawmakers cited Trump’s relationship with Vladimir Putin, and puzzled if he’s making an strive to protect the Russian president from embarrassing disclosures.
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., a senior member of the Senate Armed Providers and Foreign Members of the family committees, talked about, “it’s entirely unacceptable for the President to proceed to pursue policies that profit Putin, equivalent to withdrawing U.S. troops from Germany and pushing for Russia’s re-admittance to the G-eight.”
Shaheen added: “Russia’s adversarial actions in opposition to the US demand a solid response, no longer appeasement.”
In calling for briefings of lawmakers, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., talked about “Congress wants to clutch what the intelligence neighborhood is aware of about this well-known threat to American troops and our allies and what solutions are on hand to withhold Russia responsible.”
South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, who golfed with Trump on Sunday, tweeted on Saturday that it became once “imperative” that Congress gather to the backside of the reported bounties whereas Wyoming Republican Get. Liz Cheney called on the White House to allotment extra data.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., issued an announcement asserting he “lengthy warned about Russia’s efforts to undermine U.S. pursuits in the Heart East from Syria to Afghanistan,” noting that he authored an modification condemning Trump’s decision to drag U.S. forces from Syria and Afghanistan. 
“The US wants to prioritize defense sources, withhold a enough regional defense pressure presence, and proceed to impose serious penalties on folk that threaten us and our allies – fancy our strikes in Syria and Afghanistan in opposition to ISIS, the Taliban, and Russian mercenary forces that threatened our companions,” he talked about. 
Contributing: William Cummings, David Jackson


Spread the love
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *