Packers possess the threshold in their rivalry with the Vikings, but Minnesota has its share of wins – Acme Packing Company

Packers possess the threshold in their rivalry with the Vikings, but Minnesota has its share of wins – Acme Packing Company
Spread the love
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  


All over SB Nation, this week is Contention Week. Here at Acme Packing Company, we are capable of be inspecting the Green Bay Packers’ biggest historical rivalries and folks in opposition to their present divisional opponents. This day we originate up with a stare at the crew’s “most up-to-date” rival, the Minnesota Vikings.

In practically every broadcast of one thing equivalent to a upright rivalry sport, the coloration commentator will make some instruct alongside the strains of “these groups appropriate flat out don’t worship one yet any other.” And although the Minnesota Vikings are relative children when put next with the Green Bay Packers’ other divisional opponents, the Packers particular seem to abominate them as worthy as the Bears or Lions — if no longer more.

Since they joined the NFL in 1960, the Vikings possess given the Packers all formula of danger. Whether or no longer it used to be Bud Grant hassling Vince Lombardi’s groups within the 1960s, the house of horrors that used to be the Metrodome within the Nineties, or present Vikings’ fans obsession with replaying Anthony Barr’s hit on Aaron Rodgers in 2017, there’s been heaps of nastiness to transfer around when these two groups party.

Total series historical previous

Recent season: Packers lead 61-fifty three-2Postseason: Tied 1-1Longest trail: Vikings W7, 1975-seventy eight

1960s: Vikings make Packers work for early wins

The Vikings conducted the Packers gorgeous complicated early in their shared historical previous. Though the Packers took the decade (winning eleven of 18 conferences), the Vikings undoubtedly didn’t make it easy for them. Two of the Packers’ wins were by 5 substances or less, and within the Vikings’ seven victories, the Packers finest broke 20 substances as soon as as Bud Grant and his solid defenses place apart the clamps on the Lombardi and Company. Truly, the Vikings handed the Packers belief to be one of appropriate two losses at some stage in their march to Wide Bowl I, a 20-17 slugfest wherein the Vikings rallied to place up 10 substances within the fourth quarter on a 31-level day at Lambeau Area.

1970s: Vikings’ high-water trace corresponds with Packers’ “Gory Years”

That you just must well well no longer possess heard, however the 1970s were no longer exactly form to the Packers. Vince Lombardi used to be long gone, as were heaps of the extensive names from his generation. Bart Starr caught around for a couple of seasons, but used to be a shell of himself. He returned as head coach, but didn’t fare worthy higher. All in all, the ‘70s were a tainted time to be a Packers fan.

The Vikings, meanwhile, made all Four of their Wide Bowl appearances within the 1970s. They’d lose all Four, but they seem to possess taken out their angst on the Packers. In 20 conferences, the Packers got here out victorious appropriate Four times and finest managed to ruin 20 substances twice.

Taking part within the Vikings used to be a crew-wide boom in futility, and there used to be no higher illustration of that futility than Terdell Middleton’s 39 lift, One hundred ten yard, one landing performance for the Packers in opposition to the Vikings in 1978. Despite Middleton’s dauntless slog by the Vikings’ protection, the correct the Packers could well well enact used to be a ten-10 tie.

Eighties: Packers dominate assist conclude of Bud Grant generation

After a downturn within the 1970s, the Packers roared assist within the 80s, a minimal of to this point as their rivalry with the Vikings is worried. The Packers went 14-5 in opposition to their crimson counterparts within the 80s, including season sweeps in 1980, 1984, 1985, 1987, and 1988. The last decade also featured a couple of of basically the most lopsided games in Packers/Vikings historical previous. The Vikings handed the Packers losses of Forty two-7 and 32-6, while the Packers answered with wins of forty five-17, 38-14, and 34-14. The Packers’ forty five-17 defend is awfully mighty, as it used to be tied at 17 at one point within the zero.33 quarter earlier to erupting into a rout.

Nineties: The last decade belongs to the Packers, however the Vikings take the rivalry

The Vikings won 12 of their 20 games with the Packers within the Nineties for two easy reasons: the Metrodome and Randy Moss.

For starters, even at their mid-90s height, the Packers merely could well well no longer defend in Minnesota. Mike Holmgren didn’t win his first defend within the Metrodome until 1997, and the Packers finest won there twice within the final decade.

Randy Moss’s arrival in 1998 didn’t make issues any more straightforward. Moss introduced himself with a 5-seize, a hundred ninety-yard, two-landing performance in his first look within the rivalry, the first of over and over he’d torture the Packers.

2000s: Sizable moments and tainted blood

The principle decade of the recent millennium featured a couple of of the largest moments within the Packers/Vikings rivalry. And were it no longer for belief to be one of many more mighty unretirements in soccer historical previous, the very first sport between these two groups post-Y2k will were basically the most beautiful. In a wet, sloppy beyond regular time contest at some stage within the 2000 season, Antonio Freeman’s “he did what” seize gave the Packers an iconic 26-20 defend over the Vikings, and someplace Chris Dishman is gentle wondering exactly what came about on that play.

The Packers took the heart share of the decade within the regular season, including a pair of closing-2nd 34-31 wins at some stage within the regular season in 2004. Then all yet again, the Vikings also handed the Packers a fundamental defeat. Within the wild card round of the 2003 playoffs, the Vikings steamrolled the Packers at Lambeau Area. Randy Moss scored two touchdowns within the 31-17 whipping that wasn’t almost as end as it looks on paper, punctuating his 2nd rating with what Joe Buck would record as “a disgusting act”: faux mooning the Lambeau Area crowd.

Brett Favre outlined the leisurely share of the decade on all aspects of the rivalry. In 2007, making what would be his closing visit to the Metrodome as a member of the Packers, Favre broke Dan Marino’s memoir for profession passing touchdowns with a sixteen-yard strike to Greg Jennings.

After Favre’s first retirement, he unretired and spent the 2008 season with the Jets. Whereas he used to be there, Aaron Rodgers won his first-ever originate for the Packers, a 24-19 victory over the Vikings to initiate the 2008 season. The Vikings won the 2nd matchup in opposition to the Packers in 2008, narrowly squeaking out a 28-27 defend thanks to a Mason Crosby pass over on a Fifty two-yard discipline goal as time expired.

Then there used to be 2009.

At closing landing in his most well-most standard post-Packers ambiance, Brett Favre won both games in opposition to his passe crew, including a 38-26 effort at Lambeau Area.

2010s: Packers avenge Favre in crimson, playoff loss in a peculiar decade

If the 2000s represented this rivalry’s high point, the 2010s were its peculiar encore.

To wit: the decade entails two ties, basically the most lopsided sport within the rivalry’s historical previous (a forty five-7 Packers defend in 2011), a shutout Vikings defend (sixteen-zero in 2017), Joe Webb starting a playoff sport, and more.

The Packers opened the decade about moreover to they’ll possess hoped, avenging their losses to Favre with two wins, including a 31-three romp that one and all but ended Brad Childress’ time as the Vikings’ head coach. The Packers principally dominated the rivalry by 2014, with finest a closing-2nd loss in 2012 and a tie in 2013 (sans Aaron Rodgers) marring their memoir.

The Packers’ early dominance this decade also entails the figurative and literal demolition of the Metrodome. In their closing visit earlier to the dome would be demolished for the chicken-killing sandcrawler that’s U.S. Bank Stadium, the Packers smoked the Vikings 44-31, scoring on every force with the exception of individual that started with Four seconds left within the first 1/2 and yet any other that ended the sport.

The Vikings’ fortunes possess turned somewhat for the reason that closing week of the 2015 regular season, even supposing. They scored a defend within the de facto NFC North title sport in Week 17 that one year, beating the Packers 20-13 at Lambeau Area. Counting that sport and the first matchup of the 2015 season, the Packers are appropriate Four-5-1 in opposition to the Vikings over the closing 1/2 of the decade.

That entails three losses at the Vikings’ recent stadium, belief to be one of which featured the defective Barr/Rodgers hit. Barr landing on Rodgers in share precipitated the “physique weight” rule alternate, which conducted a key role within the Packers’ tie with the Vikings in 2018. Clay Matthews landed on Kirk Cousins and used to be flagged, nullifying what could well well gentle were a sport-sealing interception by Jaire Alexander.

The Packers rebounded in 2019, winning both games in opposition to the Vikings, including an NFC North-clinching victory in Week sixteen.

Attempting forward to 2020s

Both the Packers and Vikings made fundamental, future-altering changes this offseason. The Packers drafted the would-be successor to Aaron Rodgers within the first round this spring, selecting Jordan Be pleased, who will confidently lead the Packers to a gleaming wider lead within the series standings. The Vikings, meanwhile, turned over a right share of their protection, individual that has constantly afflicted the Packers below head coach Mike Zimmer.

Despite the incontrovertible reality that the largest names involved change into various, one thing’s for particular: there’s no motive to notify these groups will originate liking one yet any other any time rapidly.


Spread the love
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *